Kiválasztás

Die Form des Tests ist die Erzwungene-Wahl (Forced-Choice) Befragung: Die Kandidaten müssen angeben, welche in einem Block von drei Aussagen für sie am charakteristischsten ist und dann von den verbleibenden zwei Aussagen, die für sie am charakteristischsten sind. In erster Linie ist der Vorteil dieser Form, dass man das Resultat des Tests absichtlich schwierig beeinflussen kann. Der Test ist nur mit dem Computer auswertbar.

With the joint use of the two questionnaires, the competencies and the motivational factors of sales representatives can be determined. It can be also determined, in which sequence of the sales cyle is the candidate.

The CCCI is a questionnaire, which permits the individual, and/or their manager and other team members, to assess their performance objectively against 16 competencies for 360 degree profiling. The CCCI development profile is specifically designed to help structure a development discussion with the individual.

The Motivation Questionnaire is recommended for the assessment of managers and professionals. The candidate has to indicate how much various factors motivate them in their work. It can be used on its own and as a companion to SHL personality questionnaires. Since motivation fluctuates as a function of time and changing circumstances, it is recommended that the candidates be retested quite often.

The candidate has to indicate their responses on a scale from strongly agree to strongly disagree how much 162 individual statements are like them. The test provides a profile based on 17 personality traits. It is basically a version of the OPQ developed specifically for manufacturing and production jobs.

This version is a combination of the normative and ipsative approach: the respondent chooses between four statements to decide which describes them the most and the least and indicates at the same time on a scale of five how much he/she agrees with the individual statements.

In the normative format of OPQ32 individuals indicate the extent to which they agree or disagree with a series of statements on a scale of five, ranging from “completely agree” to “ I do not agree at all”. Its uncomplicated language and straightforward structure make the test accessible for everyone, however, due to its normative nature, we recommend it primarily for training and development purposes.

In this version of the test the candidate has to make “forced choices”, that is, they have to indicate which in a block of four statements is most and least like them. The ipsative method ensures that the candidates cannot bias the result of the assessment. The test cannot be hand scored.

The test is a companion to the Raven’s Matrices which measure nonverbal intelligence. It contains words that an intelligent person would probably “know” yet would not be necessarily aware of their meaning. The candidate has to choose the synonym of the words from a list of alternatives.

The two tests of the series assess manual dexterity. Candidates have to assemble structures consisting of various component parts under time limit. Hence these tests can be interpreted as straightforward job simulations.